Related article: Familial aggregation
Related article: Familial aggregation
Pathogens that grow slowly and accumulate over the course of decades may play a strong role in many chronic diseases. These bacteria are transmitted in a variety of ways: mother to fetus, sperm to embryo, and among families and social groups. Particular patient groups without the benefit of a fully functioning immune system, specifically newborn infants, people who already have illnesses, and the elderly, are uniquely susceptible to pathogens.
Those who use or consume any of the foods, drugs, and supplements which exert immunosuppressive effects are also uniquely predisposed to acquire new bacteria and permit them to reproduce. These substances include: immunosuppressants, beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin, high levels of vitamin D, and corticosteroids.
The acquisition of new bacteria is only one factor in the when and why chronic diseases strike. Bacteria are capable of rapidly changing their genetic structure – and can become more pathogenic and harder to kill with traditional therapies – through processes like horizontal gene transfer. Also, bacteria are allowed to proliferate because of a disabled immune response, for which they themselves are at least partially responsible.
It is commonly agreed upon that acute infections such as gonorrhea, influenza, and the common cold are transmitted via bodily fluids and in some cases via physical contact and breathing. Evidence is accumulating that chronic pathogens can and are transferred between people in ways previously unimagined and that these pathogens contribute to onset of chronic disease. For example, Weyermann et al. has shown that infected siblings, mothers, and fathers are all major sources for Helicobacter pylori acquisition among young children, with the infected mother likely to be the main source for childhood infection.1)
Research indicates that pathogens are able to survive in sperm, so a father can pass these bacteria to his child at the moment of conception.2) This may explain why, according to some anecdotal reports, females who have experienced multiple miscarriages have successful pregnancies after changing partners.3) Given its key role in innate immune function, the existence of the VDR in sperm also suggests that sperm are susceptible to infection.4) In 2012, Blomberg et al. showed that expression of the vitamin D metabolizing enzyme CYP24A1 in human sperm was an effective marker of semen quality.5)
Previously unrecognized, uncultivated, or difficult-to-cultivate species may play a key role in the initiation of preterm birth.
Y.W. Han 6)
A mother's womb was once considered to be sterile but studies show that chronic pathogens persist in the endometrium. Eighteen different taxa of microbes were recently identified in the amniotic fluid of women who gave birth prematurely.7) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and influenza have been shown to cross the placental barrier.8) 9) Infection with Shigella has been proposed as an explanation for the etiopathogenesis of endometriosis10) and invasion of the endometrium by bacteria has been implicated in implantation failure, spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth.11)
Evidence is also growing that certain bacteria and viruses are able to cross the placental barrier – meaning they can be passed from a pregnant woman to her fetus. Researchers now believe that the fetal gut is colonized during pregnancy. According to David Kinross: “Standard medical teaching is that the fetus is sterile. The notion that gut development is influenced by maternal bugs will come as a shock. It's a completely new way of thinking about human disease.”
The amniotic fluid of women not in labor (with intact membranes) has traditionally been considered to be free of bacteria based on studies using cultivation techniques.12) But women who deliver pre-term infants (who tend to be less healthy) has been found to contain greater numbers of bacteria than those who deliver at term. According to the authors, the data they gathered “supports a causal relationship” between the bacteria and the early pregnancies.13)
People whose parents harbor high loads of pathogens are much more likely to fall ill with a chronic disease earlier in life. Research indicates that L-form bacteria are able to survive in sperm, so a father can pass these pathogens to his child at the moment of conception. Evidence is also growing that L-form bacteria and other pathogens are able to cross the placental barrier – meaning they can be passed from a pregnant woman to her fetus.
Researchers at Peking University in Beijing recently discovered that the H5N1 bird flu virus can pass through a pregnant woman’s placenta to infect her fetus.14) Other studies have revealed that other bacterial species such as Borrelia burgdorferi and Mycobacterium tuberculosis are also capable of crossing the placental barrier during pregnancy.15) If these pathogens can be passed from mother to child during gestation, then why not other forms of bacteria that are capable of transforming into the L-form?
Inflammation, the body's evolutionary conserved response to microbes, may also weaken the amniotic membrane. Kobayashi et al. applied certain cytokines such as TNF-alpha to an organ-cultured amniotic membrane. This caused dysfunction of the amniotic barrier and disruption of tight junctions.16)
A person’s age at the time of infection — from intrauterine [occurring within the uterus] or perinatal (the time period surrounding birth), through childhood and adolescence, to adulthood and the elder years — may further influence the risk for chronic outcome.
Siobhain O'Connor, et al., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 17)
Dave Relman and team at Stanford University found that infants pick up many of the species that make up their gut flora from family members within a few weeks of birth.18) Another team found that Human papillomavirus type 16 (also called high-risk HPV-16), which has been linked to cervical cancer, can be detected in human breast milk collected during the early period after a woman delivers her baby.19)
This is evidence that pathogens are easily transmitted from family to child during the initial periods of life. Both the innate and the adaptive immune systems of infants are particularly susceptible to pathogens, which can drive chronic disease later in life.
While the innate immune system, the body's first line of defense against pathogens, is functioning at birth, it takes several weeks for an infant to develop a working adaptive immune system. Recent research has shed light on this formative period of life.
Nobel Laureate Rolf Zinkernagel injected cytomegalovirus (CMV) into the brains of a group of newborn mice. The adaptive immune system of these mice had not yet developed and consequently they were not producing lymphocytes. The researchers found that the innate immune systems of the mice were able to eliminate CMV from most of the tissues except for those of the central nervous system. As a result, the virus persisted in the brains of the mice. Later in life, when the same mice were challenged by infection with a similar virus, they developed a condition resembling a type of autoimmune disease and died. The team referred to this concept as viral “deja vu.”20)
A second group of mice were not exposed to the CMV virus until they were fully grown and their adaptive immune systems had completely developed. When these mice were exposed to CMV later in life, they were able to successfully fight the virus and lived.
Similarly, re-exposure of aged individuals to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – usually the first pathogen that a human infant encounters – can cause lesions similar to those that occur in infants.21) 22)
These studies reveals what may be one of the main reasons behind why some people seem much more susceptible to the Th1 pathogens (L-form, intracellular and biofilm bacteria) that cause chronic disease and acquire these chronic bacterial forms at higher rates than much of the rest of the population.
Rolf Zinkernagel, MD, PhD
When assessing Zinkernagel’s study, it must be noted the human adaptive immune system takes even longer to develop than the rat adaptive immune system. While it takes rats only days to fully acquire innate immunity, it takes humans several weeks. Certainly this model hints at why Th1 diseases often run in families. If parents, grandparents and relatives with high loads of the Th1 pathogens hold and care for babies during the first weeks of life, it appears that their bacteria can easily be transmitted to the child and persist in the child’s brain and other tissues.
Unfortunately, the idea of pathogen déjà vu and the presence of the Th1 pathogens are not being considered by the vast majority of other researchers and doctors besides Trevor Marshall.
The really important thing to be drawn from [Rolf Zinkernagel's] work is the reminder that the infant is unprotected in the days and weeks following birth, until it starts producing antibodies. The innate immune system is all it has got although many think that antibody transfer from the mother may be present in the breast milk. I am not sure that would be much help, but I just don’t know. Nobody does.
Trevor Marshall, PhD
The infant's innate immune defense has developed various mechanisms for protecting the body against infection. For example, the vernix caseosa, also referred to as vernix, is a fatty, milky looking substance that covers the fetus beginning around the end of the second trimester and through birth. A number of antimicrobial peptides and proteins has been identified in vernix such as the antimicrobial peptide, LL-37 (cathelicidin).23) Vernix has been shown to have a wider range of activities that protect the fetus and newborn against infection including antifungal activity, opsonizing capacity, protease inhibition and parasite inactivation.24)
However, the defense is imperfect. As discussed above, some neonates' innate immune system may not be able to clear bacteria from other tissues besides the brain during the first weeks of life.
One five-year study found that newborns who harbor certain types of bacteria in their throats, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, a common cause of pneumonia, and Haemophilus influenzae, which causes upper respiratory infections, are at significantly increased risk for developing recurrent wheeze and asthma early in life.25)
According to Dr. Erika von Mutius, from University Children’s Hospital in Munich, Germany, these findings may be interpreted to suggest that the presence and growth of bacteria in the throat in the first four weeks of life “indicates a defective innate immune response very early in life, which promotes the development of asthma.”26)
This finding “opens new perspectives for the understanding and prediction of recurrent wheeze and asthma in young children”, says lead researcher Hans Bisgard.
Spouses have a significantly greater chance of developing the same disease as their partners - a phenomenon that can best be explained if familial aggregation has an infectious cause.
A number of studies of unrelated people shows that mere proximity seems to be enough to transmit chronic disease. A case-controlled study of residents of the Isle of Man found that 40% of people with sarcoidosis had been in social contact with a person known to have the disease, compared with 1-2% of the control subjects.30) Another study reported three cases of sarcoidosis among ten firefighters who apprenticed together.31)
Research also suggests that the inflammatory disease obesity is caused by certain species of the Th1 pathogens. A study recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that a person’s risk of becoming obese increases by 57% if they have a friend who becomes obese, and by 37% if their spouse becomes obese.32) According to the researchers: “These clusters did not appear to be solely attributable to the selective formation of social ties among obese persons.”
According to Cornell researchers, milk undergoes heat treatment known as pasteurization to kill off microbes that can cause food spoilage and disease, but the bacterial strain Paenibacillus can survive this heat shock as spores and cause milk to curdle in storage.33) As spores, the bacteria can survive in dormant form for years despite the best practices in cleaning, processing and packaging. In fact, the bacteria may be uniquely adapted to overcome the twin tactics of dairy protection: pasteurization followed by refrigeration.
The spores are not only resistant to heat, the small jolt of heat during pasteurization may actually stimulate them to germinate. Some can reproduce in refrigerated dairy products at temperatures that would stymy other types of bacteria. Paenibacillus is ubiquitous in nature and cause off-flavors in a variety of foods and curdling in dairy products.
Vitamin D, and possibly other medically well-intentioned interventions (like steroid asthma inhalers for kids) are certainly a factor. But the globalization of food is the biggest issue, IMO. For example, meat is exported all over the world, a major carrier of microbes. Similarly for grains.
Birds have been around for a very long time, as have penguins, and Borrelia were recently isolated from Egyptian mummies. So in evolutionary terms, in my opinion, none of the things cited (ticks, birds, penguins) are likely to have been responsible for the surge in chronic disease these last few decades. In my opinion, the answer is lying right under our noses. Perhaps literally, since our mouths could be said to be “under our noses.”
Trevor Marshall, PhD
The following chart visually represents how chicken, beef, and poultry are traded on a global scale.
A study published in BMC Microbiology has looked at the prevalence of Campylobacter in skinless, boneless chicken breasts, tenderloins, and thighs. The meat was purchased in food stores in Alabama from 2005 to 2011. Campylobacter bacteria was found in 41% of the meat samples. This study reinforces the fact that consumers should avoid cross-contamination with raw poultry and should cook chicken to well-done.34) C. coli and C. jejuni had an average prevalence of 28% and 66%, respectively. The prevalence of Campylobacter did not change during the seven years of the study.
According to a 2011 research study, meat commonly found on grocery store shelves contain high levels of the microbes Staphylococcus aureus.35) The study found that in 96 percent of the meats with staph bacteria the bacteria were resistant to at least one type of antibiotic, and 52 percent were resistant to three or more types.
“Staph causes hundreds of thousands of infections in the United States every year,” the lead researcher, Dr. Lance Price, said in an interview about the study. “It causes a whole slew of infections ranging from skin infections to really bad respiratory infections like pneumonia.” He went on to say that staph infections kill more people in the United States each year than HIV.
Pinto et al. performed 16s rRNA gene based pyrsosequencing on water at a variety of stages in a drinking water distribution system. The team found a consistent diversity of bacteria at every stage of the multi-stage process including 16 phyla in the disinfection tank.36) Confined and unconfined aquifer ecosystems also provide conditions for growth of unique microbial communities.37)
According to a 2012 BMJ paper, elite athletes travelling to international destinations >5 time zone differences from their home country have a 2–3-fold increased risk of illness.38) Air travel does not seem to play a part as on returning home the competitors' health does not differ from normal. The researchers argue the different germs and allergens of a new environment were the key factor affecting the athletes.
In its 2011 Global Market Forecast, Airbus estimated that world air travel has grown 5% per year since 1980 and is expected to almost triple over the course of the next 20 years.
Related article: Vaccines and TB tests
Various vaccines have been shown to be contaminated and contribute to the acute onset of chronic disease.
An unexplained increase in the risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) occurred among recipients of the swine influenza vaccine in 1976-1977. Guillain-Barre syndrome remains the most frequent neurological condition reported after influenza vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) since its inception in 1990.
Penina Haber, et al. 41)
The literature contains multiple reports of sarcoidosis patients developing skin lesions within tattoos. According to one researcher, this is “a well-recognized occurrence in patients with sarcoidosis.”47) One case report describes how a patient developed sarcoidal granulomas in only one pigment of a tattoo,48) suggesting, of course, that the needle corresponding to that pigment was infected.
That a tattoo procedure could routinely induce this kind of reaction strongly suggests that some needles are infected with bacteria.
Donation of blood, bone marrow, organs or other tissues transmits pathogens between donor and recipient - even, in the case of blood donation, when there is an attempt to filter blood. At an average of around 0.01 microns in diameter, L-form bacteria are small enough to pass through even the finest of filters.49)
Organs and tissue from sarcoidosis patients have been known to cause sarcoidosis in the transplanted recipients.50) According to one study, patients who receive a donor organ from a sarcoidosis patient develop the disease, and clean organs transplanted into sarcoidosis patients become infected.51) This is proof that the bacterial pathogens can be transferred and trigger the same abnormal immune system response in susceptible people.
As with mosquitoes, which transfer malaria in tropical areas, insect bites including ticks can transfer pathogenic bacteria. Chung et al found that a cancer drug, Erbitux, was more likely to cause an allergic-type reaction in regions of the country with higher insect populations.52)
It is widely assumed that chronic Lyme disease is the result of a tick bite and occurs when bacteria such as Borellia burgdorferi is transferred to a human host.53) 54) However, this explanation is incomplete. Only about 5% of people who are bitten by a tick and fall ill with Lyme disease go on to develop chronic Lyme disease, a condition where the body is simply unable to kill the bacteria responsible for causing the illness. It is theorized that the pathogens which cause Lyme disease are able to persist by transforming into the L-form and living inside the tissues and the cells of the immune system.
As discussed above, Zinkernagel and Bisgard have shown that exposure to a pathogen at a formative time in development can later predispose an individual to chronic disease, a phenomenon Zinkernagel calls “bacterial déjà vu.” In the context of chronic Lyme disease and any of the other diseases thought to be caused by insect bites alone, bacterial déjà vu makes sense. An infant is exposed to a certain pathogen early in life when the immune system is not fully functional, and becomes uniquely predisposed him or her to triggers for chronic illness later in life.
Matt Russell is using the MP to treat his chronic Lyme disease. Matt was born five weeks premature. He was breast-fed, but also given formula supplemented with vitamin D through a tube. Ten days later he ended up in the neonatal intensive care unit and tested positive for quite a few forms of bacteria. He stopped breathing on several occasions but was revived each time and put on a cocktail of antibiotics. He responded favorably to the antibiotics and his parents were later told that he had an E. coli urinary tract infection.
Twelve years later, after being bitten by an insect that presumably also carried bacteria, Matt started to suffer from intense headaches and recurrent infections, including bladder infections. Gradually, he developed full-fledged chronic Lyme disease. It is very likely that the pathogens he had acquired at birth had persisted in his tissues, and accompanied by the bacteria introduced by the insect bite, caused him to develop a serious chronic disease later in life.
“We have always wondered why, out of the 1,600 boys in Matt’s school, he is the only one in recent memory who has missed a couple of years of schooling due to a chronic disease. We are sure he is not the only one to be bitten by an insect,” says Matt’s mother, Robyn Russell.
In 2011, Wilkinson et al. used large computer models of the Earth's atmosphere to research how widely microbes could be dispersed, determining that once the microbes of 0.02mm in diameter and below were airborne, they can easily travel thousands of kilometers.
In 2006, Jeremy Dumas et al analyzed the non-human metabolites in urine taken from population samples in Aito Town, Japan; Chicago, IL; and Guangxi, China.55) The team plotted the differences between those metabolites on a two-dimensional chart (right). As is plainly evident, the non-human metabolites from each region are distinct.
Interestingly, people who recently moved between regions began to take on the metabolic profile of that region. One particular artifact is that there are a number of violet numbers in the American group. These represent five Japanese men and women who recently moved to America. When they did that, their metabalomes suddenly took on the American characteristics rather than their native Japanese characteristics.
At the very least, Dumas's work shows that the makeup of the “metabolome” owes more to environmental factors than genetic ones. To this end, a 2004 study by Wirth showed that two human ethnic groups based in India, which could not be distinguished on the basis of human DNA markers, could be distinguished based on their patterns of H. pylori variation.56)
Certainly the exposure to and acquisition of new bacteria plays a role in the development of disease, but these factors don't account for everything. Diseases appear to strike randomly if for no other reason than their massive incidence and mortality. But, a close look at the evidence suggests that diseases tend to strike those who are most vulnerable. This is true even for acute infections such as the Black Death, the deadliest known epidemic in human history. The results of one analysis of 14th century skeletal remains found that “the Black Death did not kill indiscriminately - that it was, in fact, selective with respect to frailty….”57)
During the SARS epidemic, those who were succumbing were people with weakened immune systems, especially diabetics and healthcare workers.58) With the recent Escherichia coli O157:H7 epidemic, there appears to be a demographic pattern of patients who are likely already heavy carriers of a pathogenic microbiota. Remember that, like SARS, a lot more people are getting infected than those who actually fall ill and can't recover.
Trevor Marshall, PhD
According to the Marshall Pathogenesis, “frailty” could just as easily refer to the strength of immune response. It is the absence of a robust immune response which is the primary contributing determinant in whether someone gets sick with chronic illness or someone remains healthy.
Bacterial pathogens themselves can make a human host more hospitable for growth and reproduction by secreting substances like the sulfonolipid capnine, which bind and block the Vitamin D Receptor, a nuclear receptor that controls the innate immune response. Over time, bacteria succeed in suppressing the immune response through a gradual process known as successive infection. In the absence of intervention, successive infection is something of an inevitability as everyone who lives long enough take on the aches, pains, memory loss, and other symptoms that are the hallmark of chronic disease.
Bacteria are allowed to further proliferate when a person consumes any number of immunosuppressive foods, drugs, supplements and other substances. These substances include: immunosuppressants, beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin, corticosteroids, and foods and supplements containing high levels of vitamin D. The consumption of such substances is at historical levels and may be largely responsible for the recent spike in chronic disease incidence.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Feb;29(2):102-4.
Respiratory viral RNA on toys in pediatric office waiting rooms.
Pappas DE, Hendley JO, Schwartz RH. Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract BACKGROUND: Toys in pediatric office waiting rooms may be fomites for transmission of viruses. METHODS: Eighteen samples were taken from office objects on 3 occasions. Samples were tested for presence of picornavirus (either rhinovirus or enterovirus) on all 3 sample days; in addition, January samples were tested for respiratory syncytial virus and March samples were tested for influenza A and B. In addition, 15 samples were obtained from the sick waiting room before and after cleaning. Polymerase chain reaction was used to detect picornavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza A or B virus. Finally, 20 samples were obtained from the fingers of a researcher after handling different toys in the sick waiting room, and samples were then obtained from all the same toys; all samples were tested for picornavirus by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Viral RNA was detected on 11 of 52 (21%) of toys sampled. Ten of the positives were picornavirus; 1 was influenza B virus. Three (30%) of 10 toys from the new toy bag, 6 of 30 (20%) in the sick child waiting room, and 2 of 12 (17%) in the well child waiting room were positive. Six (40%) of 15 toys in the sick waiting room were positive for picornaviral RNA before cleaning; after cleaning, 4 (27%) of 15 were positive in spite of the fact that RNA was removed from 4 of 6 of the original positives. Three (15%) of 20 toys in the sick waiting room were positive for picornaviral RNA, but RNA was not transferred to the fingers of the investigator who handled these toys. COMMENT: About 20% of the objects in a pediatric office may be contaminated with respiratory viral RNA, most commonly picornavirus RNA. Cleaning with a disinfectant cloth was only modestly effective in removing the viral RNA from the surfaces of toys, but transfer of picornaviral RNA from toys to fingers was inefficient.
Human Fetal Immune System Arises from Entirely Different Source Than Adult Immune System
Couldn't find this easily:
- “Dave Relman's lab has, however, done a study where they found that a baby picks up all of the mother's, and most of the family's, flora within a couple of weeks of birth.” -Trevor
See pic above:
ScienceDaily (Jan. 18, 2011) — Scientists have for the first time sequenced and reconstructed the genomes of most of the microbes in the gut of a premature newborn and documented how the microbe populations changed over time. Further studies involving more infants could eventually help researchers understand the causes of various intestinal problems that afflict preemies, in particular the sometimes fatal necrotizing enterocolitis, according to researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Stanford University. One unresolved question is whether these illnesses are caused by pathogenic strains of bacteria or just an imbalance in the microbe populations in the gut. The study was posted online Dec. 29 in advance of print publication in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. While this is not the first time that microbes in the human intestinal tract have been sequenced as a community, this is the first comprehensive look at a time series documenting colonization of the gut of a premature newborn, and one of few completely assembled community genomic datasets, said Jill Banfield, a UC Berkeley professor of earth and planetary science and of environmental science, policy and management. “Sequencing of microbial communities has become exceedingly common, but many researchers work with essentially unassembled data and often analyze very short contiguous DNA sequences – genome fragments,” she said. “We actually go in and work out where the assemblies failed and fix them – what's called curating the data – so we can build very complete genomes for most of the microbes.” From acid mines to the preemie gut Pediatric surgeon Michael J. Morowitz, until recently at The University of Chicago Medical Center but now with Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and an assistant professor of surgery at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, first approached Banfield because of her pioneering work over the past decade sequencing microbial communities in extreme environments, such as the acid drainage from underground mines. He suggested that she tackle a unique human environment, the newborn intestinal tract. Unlike the adult gut, which may contain a couple of thousand microbial species, the newborn's intestinal tract may be colonized by only a handful, making it feasible to sequence the entire community. His interest stemmed from work with premature infants, most of whom spend anywhere from two weeks to six months in the intensive care unit before they're deemed healthy enough to go home. Between 5 and 10 percent of these preemies develop symptoms of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which requires rounds of antibiotics to halt, and perhaps a third of these babies eventually require surgery to remove parts of their intestines that have died. “The actual impact of necrotizing enterocolitis in the ICU is even larger, because feeding routines and other care are conducted around a fear of NEC developing,” Morowitz said. Previous studies, however, have produced conflicting results about NEC's cause. Some have found pathogenic bacteria associated with NEC, while others have found no difference between the bacteria in babies with and without NEC. Banfield, Morowitz and their collaborators suspect that these results reflect the fact that researchers have looked broadly at species or families of bacteria in the gut, rather than at variants or strains. Although coexisting strains may have genes that are 99 percent identical, their genomes could be sufficiently distinct to make one bad and the other good. “We already know that just a few genes can make one strain a pathogen and one beneficial or commensal,” meaning that the microbes live amicably with their host, Banfield said. “We expect that a lot of the issues with the colonization process in the gut that leads to disease may be tracked to subtle differences in strains,” she said. “So one question on the table is, 'Are these very closely related strains physiologically distinct, and in what ways'?” The only way to get at these differences, she said, is to sequence the entire genomes of the intestinal microbiota – not merely DNA fragments or short DNA tags, which can be used to identify the genus or even species of a microbe, but not the specific strain. Colonizing the gut “Although a primary target of our research is NEC, it's become very apparent that there are some fundamental unanswered questions just about the colonization process under normal circumstances,” Morowitz added. “It's really important to get a handle on what the normal process is first, and then, eventually, we can look closely at babies with NEC and see if they deviate from what appears to be the normal colonization process.” Other human diseases, including asthma, diabetes and obesity, have been linked to problems with microbial colonization of the gut, and several papers have reported symptomatic improvement after “transplanting” fecal material from healthy individuals to patients with a range of intestinal disorders. Banfield, Morowitz and their colleagues followed a single premature infant that had been delivered by cesarean and identified three distinct communities of intestinal microbes present at different times during the first month of the infant's life. The microbe populations in these communities seemed to change after alterations in medication and feeding, Morowitz said. Although it was presumably sterile at birth, the infant's gut was quickly colonized by a set of known intestinal microbes – bacteria and Archaea, primarily, but also viruses, bacterial viruses (phage) and the naked lengths of DNA called plasmids. When the baby went off antibiotics and switched from breast feeding to intravenous feeding, the microbe populations completely changed, with minor microbial members suddenly dominating and dominant members declining. Vincent Denef, a post-doctoral researcher in Banfield's lab who contributed to the study, noted that such real-time studies are powerful because “very rarely do we have the opportunity to observe the dynamics of a naturally occurring system, such as the infant GI tract, as it is transformed from sterile to functionally diverse.” The populations again shifted when intravenous feeding was replaced by formula. Morowitz stopped collecting feces from dirty diapers after 21 days, and the infant was sent home healthy after 9 weeks in the ICU. Though fecal samples were taken nearly every day, a complete genome analysis was performed only for samples collected on days 10, 16, 18 and 21. For the other days, the microbial community was estimated based on DNA tags (16S rRNA) that identify microbe families and species, but not specific strains. What distinguishes bad from good microbes? What surprised the researchers is that the microbial population was comprised of members of at least 20 groups, many of which include harmful as well as benign organisms. These included Staphylococcus, a frequent cause of hospital infections; Pseudomonas, “the cause of an enormous amount of morbidity in ICU patients, both children and adults,” Morowitz said; Serratia, a common cause of sepsis in general; and Citrobacter, which can cause meningitis in babies. Yet, the baby in this study appeared healthy throughout. “The gut populations are highly dynamic, with large shifts through three stages over time, but we saw an overabundance of gram-negative organisms that we often associate with disease,” he said. “Particularly striking was the dominance of Pseudomonas for several days, though the infant was clinically stable.” The seeming contradiction of a healthy infant with disease-causing bacteria in her gut could be explained if the strains in the infant's gut were benign, or if the balance of other microbes prevented pathogenic microbes from causing problems. Citrobacter, for example, is one type of bacteria that is reportedly associated with NEC: one study found Citrobacter in three of four infants with NEC, but in no control infants. Yet, in the current study, sequencing of the gut microbiome on days 16, 18 and 21 revealed the presence of two strains of Citrobacter, which fluctuated significantly in proportions on the three days. “Those big shifts could potentially have been very important for the medical state of that baby,” Banfield said. “Fortunately, the baby was fine.” The researchers found that those two strains were 99 percent similar over areas of the genome that could be compared. “Of particular interest were hot spots of rapid DNA evolution within and between genes. Those potentially could be very important and interesting,” she said. “Though the two Citrobacter genotypes are very, very similar over most of the genome, the results suggest that they could be functioning in different ways because their genomes are regulated differently.” Banfield noted that the intestinal community of the infant no doubt would continue to shift repeatedly for a year or more after birth, as the child encounters new microbes – courtesy of family, friends and pets. These populations shift with the influx of new strains and species and potentially because the resident microbes themselves evolve by picking up new traits from the plasmids and phages living alongside them. “This is an ecological study,” she emphasized. “One of the things we are trying to do is bring into the field of medicine a high resolution, ecological approach.” Other coauthors of the study are Brian C. Thomas of UC Berkeley, Valeriy Poroykoa of the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, and David A. Relman and Elizabeth K. Costello of the Stanford University School of Medicine. The work was funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Energy, the Surgical Infection Society and The March of Dimes.
Not sure what make of TM's comment here:
ps: If the FDA know the bacteria are “always going to be there” and that they are antibiotic resistant, then surely these bacteria would be harmful, de-facto? Is the FDA admitting that they already know in-vitro studies of activity and resistance of bacteria bear no resemblance to thein-vivo environment?