This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:alternate:spontaneous_remission [10.19.2018] – [Research with insufficient follow up] sallieq | home:alternate:spontaneous_remission [10.21.2018] – [Notes and comments] sallieq | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Researchers at Jefferson Medical Center in Philadelphia found a 74% relapse rate in sarcoidosis patients with treatment-induced remission, while only 60% of patients identified as having a favorable prognosis actually sustained remission over 130 months.(({{pubmed> | Researchers at Jefferson Medical Center in Philadelphia found a 74% relapse rate in sarcoidosis patients with treatment-induced remission, while only 60% of patients identified as having a favorable prognosis actually sustained remission over 130 months.(({{pubmed> | ||
- | Many argue that the most accurate study of sarcoidosis to date is the 2003 NIH ACCESS study, which followed 215 sarcoidosis patients for two years - a period during which it is sometimes mistakenly thought that the disease can go into remission. The study found that measures of sarcoidosis severity | + | Many argue that the most accurate study of sarcoidosis to date is the 2003 NIH ACCESS study, which followed 215 sarcoidosis patients for two years - a period during which it is sometimes mistakenly thought that the disease can go into remission. The study found that measures of sarcoidosis severity |
In fact, in the NIH ACCESS study there were no documented cases of spontaneous remission. Even in the positive-sounding “improved” category for clinical markers, the percentages described were at best “improved”, | In fact, in the NIH ACCESS study there were no documented cases of spontaneous remission. Even in the positive-sounding “improved” category for clinical markers, the percentages described were at best “improved”, | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
A [[http:// | A [[http:// | ||
- | The above example is a misuse of the word “cure.” For one thing, an actual cure results from a treatment that allows all participants to become well, no side effects or long-term harm included. Did the above study check in with its subjects a decade down the road in order to access their health years later? Probably not. But if they did, the subjects were probably symptomatic again, as gene therapy has not yet been adopted as an effective way to treat disease. | + | The above example is a misuse of the word “cure.” For one thing, an actual cure results from a treatment that allows all participants to become well, including |
The public often isn’t satisfied with the medical community’s perception of a “cure,” which is why so many patients have left mainstream medicine – searching for solutions among doctors that practice alternative medicine or even among psychotherapists. | The public often isn’t satisfied with the medical community’s perception of a “cure,” which is why so many patients have left mainstream medicine – searching for solutions among doctors that practice alternative medicine or even among psychotherapists. | ||
- | Unfortunately, | + | Unfortunately, |
===== How is the Marshall Protocol different? ===== | ===== How is the Marshall Protocol different? ===== | ||
- | The MP is different. It is an attempt to address the underlying cause of Th1 disease – the bacteria | + | The MP is different. It is an attempt to address the underlying cause of Th1 disease – failure of the innate immune system to control |
+ | ===== Common misperceptions ===== | ||
{{tag> | {{tag> | ||
===== Notes and comments ===== | ===== Notes and comments ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- //Sallie Q 10.21.2018// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | // the protocol is continued for 3-5 years// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A majority of patients have chosen to continue the therapy for as long as they experience improvement; | ||
+ | Usually for as long as it takes to bring 1,25 D into the healthy range and maintain this over one year of testing (if available). Minimally for at least as long as it takes to be able to get enough sleep, when healing is most active. | ||
+ | |||
+ | //patients must wear wrap-around NoIR sunglasses at all times, including inside//. Those people who already wear sunglassess have been know to find the wrap-around NoIR give superior comfort. Actually some patients never become photosensitive, | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Protocol relies on massive amounts of pharmaceutical drugs// | ||
+ | |||
+ | //MP gives you one reason for pain. 'Too much vitamin D'.// | ||
+ | The MP explains | ||
+ | Other pain may be caused by irreversible damage. | ||
+ | Patients and doctors who desire only reduction of pain may be advised to avoid the MP. Patients who desire rool-back leading to cure of immune problems must look to developments in immune support, protection and restoration | ||
+ | |||
+ | //MP could be dangerous?// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | //MP recommends the opposite of natural practitioners, | ||
+ | |||
+ | //MP staff are not open-minded.// | ||
--- //Sallie Q 06.12.2017// | --- //Sallie Q 06.12.2017// |