This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:diseases [07.13.2011] – [Notes and comments] paulalbert | home:diseases [07.13.2011] – [Notes and comments] paulalbert | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
But the fifth group of bacteria contained few lactobacilli, | But the fifth group of bacteria contained few lactobacilli, | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | Date: 2011-05-10 13:23:42 | ||
+ | Reply: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Korean J Urol. 2011 vol. 52(3) pp. 194-9 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Detection of nanobacteria in patients with chronic prostatitis and vaginitis by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Kim TH, Kim HR, Myung SC | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We found that conventional RT-PCR for NB was rapid, simple, low in cost, and easily available for the detection of NB, and that NB may be a possible etiological factor for vaginitis and CP/CPPS. The prevalence of U. urealyticum among the four patients with NB coinfection was 75%; the presence of U. urealyticum might therefore raise suspicion for nanobacterial infection. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Affiliation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: ChrisMavo | ||
+ | Date: 2011-05-10 13:29:58 | ||
+ | Reply: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Can someone explain what they mean by nanobacteria? | ||
+ | |||
+ | So many questions... sorry! | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: Bane | ||
+ | Date: 2011-05-10 14:14:45 | ||
+ | Reply: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ChrisMavo wrote: Can someone explain what they mean by nanobacteria? | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ |