This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:diseases [07.13.2011] – [Notes and comments] paulalbert | home:diseases [09.30.2011] – [Notes and comments] inge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | How about including preeclampsia in the list of diseases that the MP possibly could treat? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hypertens Pregnancy. 2010; | ||
+ | Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in preeclampsia. | ||
+ | Xie F, Hu Y, Magee LA, Money DM, Patrick DM, Brunham RM, Thomas E, von Dadelszen P; Toxaemia group. | ||
+ | Collaborators (5) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Source | ||
+ | Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, | ||
+ | Abstract | ||
+ | OBJECTIVE: | ||
+ | The maternal syndrome of preeclampsia results from systemic endothelial activation by a number of factors that primarily derive from the intervillous space, so-called intervillous soup. Co-precipitants, | ||
+ | |||
+ | STUDY DESIGN: | ||
+ | A case-control study was performed on 50 women with preeclampsia, | ||
+ | |||
+ | RESULTS: | ||
+ | Neither the number of women with measurable copy numbers of C. pneumoniae gDNA, the anti-C. pneumoniae seroprevalence, | ||
+ | |||
+ | CONCLUSION: | ||
+ | Our data suggest an association between C. pneumoniae infection and preeclampsia. While not a uniform and singular precipitant of the maternal syndrome of preeclampsia, | ||
+ | |||
+ | PMID: 20818953 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Am J Ther. 2008 Jul-Aug; | ||
+ | Subclinical infection as a cause of inflammation in preeclampsia. | ||
+ | López-Jaramillo P, Herrera JA, Arenas-Mantilla M, Jáuregui IE, Mendoza MA. | ||
+ | Source | ||
+ | Vilano Group, Research Institute, Cardiovascular Foundation of Colombia, Floridablanca, | ||
+ | Abstract | ||
+ | Preeclampsia, | ||
+ | |||
+ | PMID: 18645342 | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
Line 129: | Line 165: | ||
But the fifth group of bacteria contained few lactobacilli, | But the fifth group of bacteria contained few lactobacilli, | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | Date: 2011-05-10 13:23:42 | ||
+ | Reply: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Korean J Urol. 2011 vol. 52(3) pp. 194-9 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Detection of nanobacteria in patients with chronic prostatitis and vaginitis by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Kim TH, Kim HR, Myung SC | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We found that conventional RT-PCR for NB was rapid, simple, low in cost, and easily available for the detection of NB, and that NB may be a possible etiological factor for vaginitis and CP/CPPS. The prevalence of U. urealyticum among the four patients with NB coinfection was 75%; the presence of U. urealyticum might therefore raise suspicion for nanobacterial infection. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Affiliation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: ChrisMavo | ||
+ | Date: 2011-05-10 13:29:58 | ||
+ | Reply: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Can someone explain what they mean by nanobacteria? | ||
+ | |||
+ | So many questions... sorry! | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: Bane | ||
+ | Date: 2011-05-10 14:14:45 | ||
+ | Reply: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ChrisMavo wrote: Can someone explain what they mean by nanobacteria? | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ |