This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:othertreatments:antibacterials:highdose [06.29.2010] – paulalbert | home:othertreatments:antibacterials:highdose [03.06.2011] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Antibiotic protocols and treatments other than the Marshall Protocol have been widely prescribed for certain Th1 diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and Lyme disease. However, the evidence for these treatments' | Antibiotic protocols and treatments other than the Marshall Protocol have been widely prescribed for certain Th1 diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and Lyme disease. However, the evidence for these treatments' | ||
- | Although the Th1 diseases are caused by bacterial pathogens, alternatives to the Marshall Protocol are ineffective for at least several reasons. For one, antibiotics given in high enough doses interfere with immune activity. With a weakened inflammatory response, a patient' | + | Although the Th1 diseases are caused by bacterial pathogens, |
Also, these protocols do not use olmesartan (Benicar) to activate the Vitamin D Receptor. Protocols which do not generate sustained immunopathology are ultimately not effective against the Th1 diseases. | Also, these protocols do not use olmesartan (Benicar) to activate the Vitamin D Receptor. Protocols which do not generate sustained immunopathology are ultimately not effective against the Th1 diseases. | ||
+ | |||
===== Immunosuppression of high-dose antibiotics ===== | ===== Immunosuppression of high-dose antibiotics ===== | ||
Line 59: | Line 60: | ||
< | < | ||
- | **// | + | **//M.T. Labro//** (({{pubmed> |
Earlier on in the paper, Labro concludes that when it comes to treating inflammatory diseases, immunosuppression is " | Earlier on in the paper, Labro concludes that when it comes to treating inflammatory diseases, immunosuppression is " |