This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:pathogenesis:kochs_postulates [08.08.2011] – [Still valid?] paulalbert | home:pathogenesis:kochs_postulates [09.22.2011] – [Rethinking Koch] paulalbert | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Another problem with the postulates - and perhaps its most significant liability - is that the rules fail to successfully account for [[home: | Another problem with the postulates - and perhaps its most significant liability - is that the rules fail to successfully account for [[home: | ||
===== Rethinking Koch ===== | ===== Rethinking Koch ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | //**David N. Fredricks and David A. Relman**// | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
Koch's contributions were substantial, | Koch's contributions were substantial, | ||
- | The blind adherence to Koch's postulates precludes a more nuanced understanding of disease: it is in fact a group of genetically indistinct organisms, a [[home: | + | The blind adherence to Koch's postulates precludes a more nuanced understanding of disease: it is in fact a group of genetically indistinct organisms, a [[home: |