This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:pathogenesis:vitamind:low25d [03.06.2011] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | home:pathogenesis:vitamind:low25d [01.03.2012] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
===== Anomalies ===== | ===== Anomalies ===== | ||
+ | * **risk of breast cancer** – In a 2011 study of nurses who were predominantly premenopausal, | ||
* **risk of prostate cancer** – In a 2008 nested case-control study appearing in //Journal of the National Cancer Institute//, | * **risk of prostate cancer** – In a 2008 nested case-control study appearing in //Journal of the National Cancer Institute//, | ||
* **risk of pancreatic cancer** – Patients with the highest levels of 25-D were at greatest risk of pancreatic cancer.(({{pubmed> | * **risk of pancreatic cancer** – Patients with the highest levels of 25-D were at greatest risk of pancreatic cancer.(({{pubmed> | ||
Line 81: | Line 82: | ||
===== Notes and comments ===== | ===== Notes and comments ===== | ||
- | TECHEDIT | + | |
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | A recent study accepted for publication in The Endocrine Society' | ||
+ | |||
+ | This new study however found a U-SHAPED RELATIOSHIP between vitamin D levels and frailty; older women with vitamin D levels higher than 30 ng/ml and those with levels lower than 20 ng/ml were more likely to be frail. | ||
+ | |||
+ | “Vitamin D supplementation has grown in popularity, yet the association between vitamin D status and risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults is uncertain," | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | </ | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== |