Home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
home:physicians:concerns [06.01.2019] – [Read also] sallieqhome:physicians:concerns [06.05.2019] – [Concerns about lack of clinical evidence] sallieq
Line 18: Line 18:
 For some physicians, the above evidence is not sufficiently compelling to warrant automatically starting a patient on the MP without further consideration. Here are some other factors which may play a role in the clinical judgment: For some physicians, the above evidence is not sufficiently compelling to warrant automatically starting a patient on the MP without further consideration. Here are some other factors which may play a role in the clinical judgment:
   * evidence for the efficacy of MP versus other available treatment options(({{pubmed>long:19050187}}))   * evidence for the efficacy of MP versus other available treatment options(({{pubmed>long:19050187}}))
-  * more recent material on patient response, see below update+  * 2013 material on patient response, see section below 
   * patients' expressed preferences and values(({{pubmed>long:19050187}}))   * patients' expressed preferences and values(({{pubmed>long:19050187}}))
   * additional benefits of Olmesartan [[https://mpkb.org/home/protocol/olmesartan#other_benefits_of_olmesartan_in_patients_-_recent_studies|other researched benefits]]   * additional benefits of Olmesartan [[https://mpkb.org/home/protocol/olmesartan#other_benefits_of_olmesartan_in_patients_-_recent_studies|other researched benefits]]
home/physicians/concerns.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.