Home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
home:physicians:concerns [07.10.2019] – [Concerns about lack of clinical evidence] sallieqhome:physicians:concerns [07.10.2019] – [Concerns about lack of clinical evidence] sallieq
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 For some physicians, the above evidence is not sufficiently compelling to warrant automatically starting a patient on the MP without further consideration. Here are some other factors which may play a role in the clinical judgment: For some physicians, the above evidence is not sufficiently compelling to warrant automatically starting a patient on the MP without further consideration. Here are some other factors which may play a role in the clinical judgment:
-  * alternative hypotheses and evidence of research (({{pubmed>long:23370376}})), (({{pubmed>long:18200565}})) +  * alternative hypotheses and evidence of research (({{pubmed>long:    15246025}})), (({{pubmed>long:16403216}})), (({{pubmed>long:23370376}})), (({{pubmed>long:18200565}})) 
   * evidence for the efficacy of MP versus other available treatment in 2013 data on patient response, see section below    * evidence for the efficacy of MP versus other available treatment in 2013 data on patient response, see section below 
   * patients' expressed preferences and values(({{pubmed>long:19050187}}))   * patients' expressed preferences and values(({{pubmed>long:19050187}}))
home/physicians/concerns.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.