You are here: Welcome to the MPKB » Welcome to the MPKB » Publications & presentations » Survey of Marshall Protocol patients with autoimmune diagnoses (2008)
Home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
home:publications:mp2008_survey [03.06.2011] – external edit 127.0.0.1home:publications:mp2008_survey [04.16.2011] – [Notes and comments] inge
Line 96: Line 96:
   * We should include some of the survey questions, so readers know what was asked. ... Ok, I'll work on that. -//J//   * We should include some of the survey questions, so readers know what was asked. ... Ok, I'll work on that. -//J//
   * <del>Given that there don't appear to be any meaningful distinctions between diseases, I am not sure the below chart offers anything substantive. It's not like a person can look at this chart, and say, "Okay, I see." What do you think about putting it out to pasture?  --- //Paul Albert 2009/01/02 09:12//</del> Removed. -//J//   * <del>Given that there don't appear to be any meaningful distinctions between diseases, I am not sure the below chart offers anything substantive. It's not like a person can look at this chart, and say, "Okay, I see." What do you think about putting it out to pasture?  --- //Paul Albert 2009/01/02 09:12//</del> Removed. -//J//
-  * I love this chart.  When I first saw it in the presentation on the link from the legacy site, it gave me a sense of the relative number of cohort members with various conditions, and gave me some documented evidence I could quote to friends with MP-treatable conditions.  The resolution of this chart on this site is much better than what I was originally able to see (from a photo showing the powerpoint in the background).  Even being able to read only the RA results clearly at that earlier time, it was helpful.  Shown clearly, I love it even more.  My one suggestion is that the link to this study, in Recovery Rate in the main Statistics article, is described only as methodology.  I was hoping to see the results, and seeing no link to results, I hit the methodology link just in case.  I'd like to see the link described as results AND methodology not just methodology, to make the info easier to find. -//Dody 2009/03/08//   +  * I love this chart.  When I first saw it in the presentation on the link from the legacy site, it gave me a sense of the relative number of cohort members with various conditions, and gave me some documented evidence I could quote to friends with MP-treatable conditions.  The resolution of this chart on this site is much better than what I was originally able to see (from a photo showing the powerpoint in the background).  Even being able to read only the RA results clearly at that earlier time, it was helpful.  Shown clearly, I love it even more.  My one suggestion is that the link to this study, in Recovery Rate in the main Statistics article, is described only as methodology.  I was hoping to see the results, and seeing no link to results, I hit the methodology link just in case.  I'd like to see the link described as results AND methodology not just methodology, to make the info easier to find. -//Dody 2009/03/08//  
 +  * It doesn't say how the patients were selected  
home/publications/mp2008_survey.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.