This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Previous revision | |||
— | home:publications:proal_autoimmunity_2010 [09.14.2022] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ~~NOTOC~~ | ||
+ | ====== Presentation - Metagenomic symbiosis between bacterial and viral pathogens in autoimmune disease ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ youtube> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Type:** Conference presentation\\ | ||
+ | **Presenter: | ||
+ | **Conference: | ||
+ | **Location: | ||
+ | **Date: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Abstract ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | An increasing number of viruses have been detected in autoimmune conditions. However, the persistence mechanisms of the human virome are not yet fully understood. Recent studies demonstrated that persistent bacterial species such as Mycobacteria and Borrelia are able to suppress expression of TACO, TLR2, and key endogenous antimicrobials by dysregulating the VDR nuclear receptor. The suppression of these endogenous antimicrobials allows the persistence and proliferation of opportunistic viral pathogens. Thus, any one autoimmune disease state is likely due to the gradual accumulation of a unique mix of both persistent bacterial and viral genomes. The majority of these genomes have yet to be fully characterized, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Transcript ===== | ||
+ | ====#1 Introduction==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | It's great to speak here, and be in Slovenia. I'm going to just jump right in... Today I'm going to discuss how metagenomic research can advance our understanding of infection and autoimmunity. The term metagenomics refers to [the study of] the collective genomes of different microorganisms. And that's what I'm going to be discussing today - how, in the human body, many different microbial genomes can combine to cause a disease state. | ||
+ | ====#2 Bacterial composition of psoriatic vs. healthy skin, by select phyla==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, this chart shows the composition of three important phyla that persist in the skin.(({{pmid> | ||
+ | ====#3 Molecular technologies allow microbes to be identified==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | How are these bacteria detected? Well, instead of just using cultivation techniques, standard cultivation methods, to find the bacteria, the researchers used 16S RNA sequencing. They identified over 1,925 clones in the skin. | ||
+ | |||
+ | And similar techniques - these are techniques that also rely on identifying bacteria by characterizing their DNA - such as shotgun sequencing, pyrosequencing, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, in the psoriasis study, 84 of the clones likely represented novel species never before known to persist in the skin. And these tools allow us to study microbes in the tissues in which they persist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Over the past few years, thanks to these molecular tools there have been so many novel microbes discovered in the human body. And in fact, there have been so many that we now realize that just a fraction of these microbes can be successfully cultured if we would only use standard laboratory methods. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====#4 Pathogens a.k.a. " | ||
+ | |||
+ | To emphasize my point, I've put together this highly scientific illustration. And this is, for example, according to current NIH estimates, how many microbes you'd likely see here if we just used standard laboratory tests to look at this group of hypothetical rascals. So you can understand how, before the advent of molecular technology, when all these guys in the background were not detectable, the notion that the human body was relatively sterile became commonplace. But today we realize that there are thousands more genomes in Homo Sapiens, and actually most of them have yet to even be named and characterized. | ||
+ | ====#5 Human Microbiome Project==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | That's why the NIH is currently running the Human Microbiome Project, and it's a correlate to the Human Genome Project, where they are funding essentially the top genomic centers in the country to continue studying the differences in populations between bacteria and other microbes in health and disease. | ||
+ | |||
+ | With this in mind, it's entirely possible that in autoimmune disease the antibodies are not being created in response to self but are instead being produced in response to these pathogens. | ||
+ | ====#6 Gestational age at delivery as a function of bacterial rDNA concentrates in the amniotic fluid==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Even tissues with the highest reputation for sterility such as, let's say, the amniotic fluid, are actually filled with a diversity of bacteria. In 2008 DiGullio and Relman at Stanford published a paper showing the presence of 18 different bacterial taxa in the amniotic fluid.(({{pmid> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====#7 How does chronic disease develop? | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this context, how does chronic inflammatory disease appear to develop? We can examine this question at the molecular level. And, key to the process is that chronic bacteria and viruses can alter expression of the body's metabolites. | ||
+ | ====#8 Nuclear receptors down regulated upon infection==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Take, for example, the Vitamin D Receptor or VDR - it's a type 1 nuclear receptor. It turns out that viruses like Epstein-Barr Virus and bacteria like // | ||
+ | ====#9 The Vitamin D Receptor (VDR)==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | You might ask, why the VDR? Colloquially speaking, the VDR serves as a " | ||
+ | ====#10 HIV and Borrelia burgdorferi==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | And note that HIV persists in the same fashion. It completely overtakes the VDR in order to transcribe its own genome.(({{pmid> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is such a logical survival mechanism on the part of these microbes that it's almost certain that other less well-studied microbes have also evolved to slow VDR activity, or the activity of other receptors involved in controlling the immune response. | ||
+ | ====#11 Successive infection==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | These persistence mechanisms result in a snowball effect. When the immune system slows, and a person acquires one pathogen, then it becomes easier for them to acquire yet another pathogen. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the context of successive infection, an inflammatory disease state appears to result from the combined pathogenicity of the sum of microbes that any one person accumulates over the course of a lifetime. As human genes are upregulated or downregulated by components of these microbes, the human body shifts further and further away from its natural state of homeostasis. | ||
+ | |||
+ | And, infected cells increasingly struggle to correctly produce human metabolites in the face of all the proteins and enzymes that are being created by the pathogenic microbes. So, | ||
+ | ====#12 Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, over the past years, Epstein-Barr Virus has been detected in so many different proportions in so many disease states. | ||
+ | ====#13 Pathogens, aka " | ||
+ | |||
+ | With this in mind, a "one microbe/one disease" | ||
+ | ====#14 Co-morbidities among inflammatory diagnoses==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | It may also not be by accident that the uniqueness with which a patients' | ||
+ | ====#15 Select bacterial genera detected in commonly smoked cigarettes==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where do we pick up these pathogens? They' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, and I want to stress this, the model of successive infection has great implications for the way autoimmune disease should be treated. If microbes - both bacterial and viral - are driving the autoimmune disease state, then treatments that suppress the immune response can at best succeed in achieving short-term palliation. They offer temporary relief by slowing the inflammation that would otherwise be generated if the immune system were actually targeting the pathogens. But instead the pathogens remain alive and they' | ||
+ | |||
+ | This being said, I work with the non-profit Autoimmunity Research Foundation and we, over the last six years have been working with a treatment for autoimmune disease that stimulates rather than suppresses the immune response in autoimmune disease. And, key to the treatment is the use of a VDR agonist which turns on - returns on - those components of the innate immune system that I described before that were so important. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====#16 " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Even when you leave this conference I hope you keep one important consideration - and honestly, this is a potential paradigm shift that we're dealing with here - in mind. When it comes to the immune responses in autoimmune disease: Don't palliate, stimulate!! | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tag> | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | ===== Notes and comments ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add this to heading after the PDF is completed: | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | <a href=" | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== References =====</ | ||