Home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
home:food:aim_health:aging [02.09.2019] – [with additional studies] sallieqhome:food:aim_health:aging [02.11.2019] – [with additional studies] sallieq
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 ===== with additional studies ===== ===== with additional studies =====
- 
- In conclusion, there is no robust signal for harm with olmesartan use.  (({{pubmed>long:24535009}}))   
  
  Although uncontrolled confounding might still exist, olmesartan does not seem to increase cardiovascular risk compared with losartan. (({{pubmed>long:24516110}}))   Although uncontrolled confounding might still exist, olmesartan does not seem to increase cardiovascular risk compared with losartan. (({{pubmed>long:24516110}})) 
Line 18: Line 16:
 The data demonstrate potential benefits of reducing the heart rate of type 2 diabetes patients, and indicate that olmesartan could, in particular, reduce the risk of microalbuminuria in patients with low heart rate. (({{pubmed>long:27082551}}))  The data demonstrate potential benefits of reducing the heart rate of type 2 diabetes patients, and indicate that olmesartan could, in particular, reduce the risk of microalbuminuria in patients with low heart rate. (({{pubmed>long:27082551}})) 
  
-Therapeutic and supratherapeutic OM doses had no clinically significant effect on cardiac repolarization and were well tolerated. (({{pubmed>long:26239632}})) +Therapeutic and supratherapeutic OLM doses had no clinically significant effect on cardiac repolarization and were well tolerated. (({{pubmed>long:26239632}}))  
 + 
 + In conclusion, there is no robust signal for harm with olmesartan use.  (({{pubmed>long:24535009}}))   
  
 ==== General research on aging ==== ==== General research on aging ====
home/food/aim_health/aging.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.