Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- home:lifestyle:light:skin_protection [03.06.2011] – external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ home:lifestyle:light:skin_protection [04.09.2011] – [Notes and comments] paulalbert
@@ Line 201: / Line 201: @@
 ..Trevor..</blockquote>
+<blockquote>From: jcwat101Date: 2011-02-21 11:06:19
+Reply: http://marshallprotocol.com/reply.php?topic_id=13718
+The two studies Trevor cited regarding sunscreen did not use zinc oxide but the synthetic chemical sunscreens.
+I find that zinc oxide at high concentrations (18-25 %) does work for me if I'm not outside a long time.
+But it only blocks 90% or so of the sun's effects.
+If you are outside more than two or three hours, it becomes less effective.  If you are out 5 or 6 it is almost like you didn't wear it because of the % of the light that gets past the sunscreen.
+I also have evidence from my own experience that the zinc oxide is not absorbed significantly, since if I don't wash it off, it continues to work for days.  Yet briefly washing one's hands for instance means the effect is gone.
+This is unlike the synthetic chemical sunscreens that break down and/or are absorbed within a couple hours of putting them on.
+This supports various studies various laboratory studies of zinc oxide.  I know Trevor is skeptical about the absorption, but since my experience agrees with the studies, I tend to think they are correct.
+Joyce Waterhouse
+See  http://marshallprotocol.com/forum11/13724  for discussion of sun exposure and sunscreens etc...
+From: Dr Trevor Marshall
+Date: 2011-02-21 11:40:42
+Reply: http://marshallprotocol.com/reply.php?topic_id=13718
+Joyce is correct, sunscreens are still a grey area where there is a paucity of real data :)
+</blockquote>
 ===== References =====

home/lifestyle/light/skin_protection.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1