Home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
home:pathogenesis:vitamind:observational_bias [10.27.2018] – [People who supplement with vitamin D are demonstrably different] sallieqhome:pathogenesis:vitamind:observational_bias [12.19.2018] – [Press releases] sallieq
Line 54: Line 54:
   * 88% of professional mothers gave their sons and daughters vitamin D supplements as opposed to 74% of farmers' offspring.   * 88% of professional mothers gave their sons and daughters vitamin D supplements as opposed to 74% of farmers' offspring.
   * 87% of those with more than a basic education gave the supplement as opposed to 80% who had a basic or no education.   * 87% of those with more than a basic education gave the supplement as opposed to 80% who had a basic or no education.
 +
 +==== Unreliable research, Press releases ====
 +
 +<blockquote>A systematic approach using statistical techniques to assess randomization outcomes can evaluate data integrity, in this case suggesting these RCT results may be unreliable. (({{pubmed>long:27920281}}))</blockquote>
 +
 +<blockquote>Dietary supplements industry press releases issued in response to clinical research findings are characterized by 'spin' that hypes results that are favourable to supplement use and denigrates results that are not.(({{pubmed>long:24992571}}))
 +</blockquote>
  
  
home/pathogenesis/vitamind/observational_bias.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.