Home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
home:special:emf:body [05.26.2019] – [Precautions] sallieqhome:special:emf:body [05.26.2019] – [Warning signs] sallieq
Line 23: Line 23:
 ( Russia has entirely different attitude to radiation: levels allowed are __1000 times **less**__ than in the USA.) ( Russia has entirely different attitude to radiation: levels allowed are __1000 times **less**__ than in the USA.)
  
-===  Pilot projects to provide high-speed 5G wireless internet halted due to health fears, according to April 2019 reports. ===+===== Precautions =====
  
-Plans for a pilot project to provide high-speed 5G wireless internet in Brussels have been halted due to fears for the health of citizens, according to April 2019 reports. 
  
-In July, the government concluded an agreement with three telecom operators to relax the strict radiation standards in BrusselsBut according to the Region, it is now impossible to estimate the radiation from the antennas required for the service+[[http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/EMF-Guideline.pdf|Vienna Medical Association's 10 Medical Rules for EMF-sensitive patients]]
  
-In Brussels the Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told [[https://ehtrust.org/brussels-belgium-and-rome-municipality-oppose-wireless-5g-antennas/|Brussels Times]]  +//Dr Andrew PT Tresidder,//  [[http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4098/rr-17|Should NHS premises provide free access to wi-fi?]]
-<blockquote>I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt. +
-</blockquote>+
  
-and in Rome a council action "Apply the precautionary principle sanctioned by the European Union" against mayoral approval of 5G  passed with 11 votes in favor and abstentions +<blockquote>Affected people experience symptoms from exposure to RF transmissions, which include headaches, brain fog, inability to think clearly, speech disturbance, palpitations, sleep disturbance, epistaxis, fatigue, dizziness, vertigo, odd pains and tinglings in limbs - and interestingly ants exposed to wifi lose their ability to forage and die, amongst other creatures affected by non-thermal effects. Prevalence in the population is estimated at 3-5%, mainly undiagnosed.
-==== From M P Study Site ====+
  
-<blockquote>//Prof. Marshall replies to someone whose outdoor seating is impacted by close neighbour// You really can't afford to be sitting within 10 ft of smart meterThe front of ours is directed at our neighbors (by the installer) and the inside of the wall behind the meter is painted with yShieldwhich also stops the cellphone signals which were getting in through the electrical panel. +Unfortunately, there is a common misperception that this is due to a nocebo effect - but the sham used in some trials was actually biologically activeCFS/ME and the Gulf War syndrome were both initially thought to be psychological disturbances by some investigatorssince disproved.
-</blockquote>+
  
-<blockquote> davidmac (Hoffer) An important paper on how Electosmog Influences autoimmune disease can be found here at pubmed: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27412293|Electrosmog impacts autoimmune response]] It's not unreasonable to conclude that the nationwide rollout of 5G will likely contribute to an epidemic of autoimmune diseases and a further deterioration of those already battling such diseases. +The Austrian Medical Association has published guidelines on the topic [[http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/EMF-Guidelin...|EMF guidelines (Austria)]]
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  
-<blockquote> TM Posted: Tue May 31st, 2016 02:34  
-“I have been reading the literature from the first half of the 20th century and the mechanisms for EMF damage are well-documented, but just ignored. Frohlich pointed out that the human eye is capable of detecting just one photon of non-ionizing radiation, for example. Photosynthesis is similarly a very sensitive molecular process.  
  
-You have all seen the mechanism for biological damage -- those atoms bobbing around in my molecular dynamics emulations (such as this one: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndhx0hNBB9Y|Activation of the human VDR by Olmesartan]] ). +<blockquote>
  
-Lorentz determined in the 19th century that moving charges had a force exerted on them by an electromagnetic field, and this was one of the pillars of Einstein's initial "Special Theory of Relativity." Once you really start to research the literature there is nothing new or complex here... unless you put your head in the sand...” +Current UK safety limits for RF are based upon the flawed misapprehension that non-thermal = non-harmful, and at present there are no plans to review this. Basically, if it doesn’t start to cook you in six minutes, it’s safe…..
-</blockquote>+
  
-<blockquote> TM  Posted: Mon Jun 20th, 2016 22:48  +It has been known for well over 30 years that there are non-thermal (signal) effects of RF. 
-“William Bise reported that Human Biology was sensitive to RF at very low levels.1 He reported in 1977 that human EEG was affected below -80dBm. He also reported headaches induced at -60dBm+
  
-I was skeptical of his numbers until I reproduced similar results with the CWS and shielded clothingRecently I found he had been an RF Engineer for 14 years prior to his study, so I now trust his measured values     ...I have located a copy of testimony that he gave to a Senate committee in 1978 about his studies which give even more detail about his equipment and subjects. His submission starts on page 3 here:  [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/751078|Senate hearing on Radiation Health and Safety 95th Congress]]+Non-thermal biological effects of exposure to RF (microwave) signal include increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, failure of repair of DNA breaks, heat shock protein synthesis, cellular calcium efflux, sympathetic upregulation and others. RF is currently classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Class 2b possible carcinogenOther research shows adverse effects on semen quality amongst other biological effects. 
 + 
 +History tells us that technological advance ALWAYS precedes safety considerations in all industries (see use of car safety belts, Xrays and asbestos for example), and the rollout of 24 hour transmitting wifi, cordless phones, and other technology has been on the presumption of no harm.
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
- 
- 
-===== Biological activity ===== 
- 
-[{{:home:waves:5G_burnt_his_body.gif?w=420h=960|** Effects of 5G in Costa del Sol illustrated by pensioner**}}]   
- 
- 
- Abstract [[http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557|biological activity of low-intensity R F radiation]] 
- 
-Analysis of the currently available peer-reviewed scientific literature reveals molecular effects induced by low-intensity RFR in living cells; this includes significant activation of key pathways generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of peroxidation, oxidative damage of DNA and changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes.  
- 
-It indicates that among 100 currently available peer-reviewed studies dealing with oxidative effects of low-intensity RFR, in general, 93 confirmed that RFR induces oxidative effects in biological systems.  
- 
-A wide pathogenic potential of the induced ROS and their involvement in cell signaling pathways explains a range of biological/health effects of low-intensity RFR, which include both cancer and non-cancer pathologies. 
-(({{pubmed>long:26151230}}))  
- 
- 
-On the basis of two decades of epidemiological studies, an increased risk for childhood leukemia associated with Extremely Low Frequency fields has been consistently assessed, inducing the International Agency for Research on Cancer to insert them in the 2B section of carcinogens in 2001.  
- 
-Care should be taken to avoid methodological limitations and to determine the patho-physiological relevance of any alteration found in EMFs-exposed biological system.  
-(({{pubmed>long:3444040}}))                                           
  
 ===== Meters and mobiles ===== ===== Meters and mobiles =====
Line 108: Line 80:
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  
-==== Warning signs ==== 
  
-<blockquote> Among the more commonly reported changes are sleep disturbance/insomniaheadache, depression/depressive symptoms, fatigue/tiredness, dysesthesia, concentration/attention dysfunction, memory changes, dizziness, irritability, loss of appetite/body weightrestlessness/anxiety, nausea, skin burning/tingling/dermographism and EEG changes. In summary, then, the mechanism of action of microwave EMFs, the role of the VGCCs in the brain, the impact of non-thermal EMFs on the brainextensive epidemiological studies performed over the past 50 yearsand five criteria testing for causalityall collectively show that various non-thermal microwave EMF exposures produce diverse neuropsychiatric effects.+===  Pilot projects to provide high-speed 5G wireless internet halted due to health fearsaccording to April 2019 reports. === 
 + 
 +Plans for a pilot project to provide high-speed 5G wireless internet in Brussels have been halted due to fears for the health of citizensaccording to April 2019 reports. 
 + 
 +In July, the government concluded an agreement with three telecom operators to relax the strict radiation standards in Brussels. But according to the Regionit is now impossible to estimate the radiation from the antennas required for the service.  
 + 
 +In Brussels the Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told [[https://ehtrust.org/brussels-belgium-and-rome-municipality-oppose-wireless-5g-antennas/|Brussels Times]]  
 +<blockquote>I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standardswhich must protect the citizenare not respected5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  
-(({{pubmed>long:22991514}})) +and in Rome a council action "Apply the precautionary principle sanctioned by the European Union" against mayoral approval of 5G  passed with 11 votes in favor and 3 abstentions.  
-<blockquote>The increased social and public interest in this subject, based on the epidemiological data associating the extra risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), childhood leukemia, adult brain cancer, and miscarriage with the EMFs exposure of the power line radiation [3–9]prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) Report (2007) and WHO Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) Report (2007) to issue precautions against the ELF-EMFs+ 
 +==== From M P Study Site ==== 
 + 
 +<blockquote>//Prof. Marshall replies to someone whose outdoor seating is impacted by close neighbour// You really can't afford to be sitting within 10 ft of a smart meter. The front of ours is directed at our neighbors (by the installer) and the inside of the wall behind the meter is painted with yShieldwhich also stops the cellphone signals which were getting in through the electrical panel.
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  
-[[http://www.naturalnews.com/050906_cell_phones_cancer_risk_tumors.html|cancer risk]] +<blockquote> davidmac (Hoffer) An important paper on how Electosmog Influences autoimmune disease can be found here at pubmed: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27412293|Electrosmog impacts autoimmune response]] It's not unreasonable to conclude that the nationwide rollout of 5G will likely contribute to an epidemic of autoimmune diseases and further deterioration of those already battling such diseases 
-Using a cell phone for an hour day increases cancer risk by 500%, study shows.+</blockquote>
  
 +<blockquote> TM Posted: Tue May 31st, 2016 02:34 
 +“I have been reading the literature from the first half of the 20th century and the mechanisms for EMF damage are well-documented, but just ignored. Frohlich pointed out that the human eye is capable of detecting just one photon of non-ionizing radiation, for example. Photosynthesis is similarly a very sensitive molecular process. 
  
 +You have all seen the mechanism for biological damage -- those atoms bobbing around in my molecular dynamics emulations (such as this one: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndhx0hNBB9Y|Activation of the human VDR by Olmesartan]] ). 
  
 +Lorentz determined in the 19th century that moving charges had a force exerted on them by an electromagnetic field, and this was one of the pillars of Einstein's initial "Special Theory of Relativity." Once you really start to research the literature there is nothing new or complex here... unless you put your head in the sand...”
 +</blockquote>
  
-===== Precautions =====+<blockquote> TM  Posted: Mon Jun 20th, 2016 22:48  
 +“William Bise reported that Human Biology was sensitive to RF at very low levels.1 He reported in 1977 that human EEG was affected below -80dBm. He also reported headaches induced at -60dBm. 
  
 +I was skeptical of his numbers until I reproduced similar results with the CWS and shielded clothing. Recently I found he had been an RF Engineer for 14 years prior to his study, so I now trust his measured values     ...I have located a copy of testimony that he gave to a Senate committee in 1978 about his studies which give even more detail about his equipment and subjects. His submission starts on page 3 here:  [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/751078|Senate hearing on Radiation Health and Safety 95th Congress]]
 +</blockquote>
  
-[[http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/EMF-Guideline.pdf|Vienna Medical Association's 10 Medical Rules for EMF-sensitive patients]] 
  
-//Dr Andrew PT Tresidder,//  [[http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4098/rr-17|Should NHS premises provide free access to wi-fi?]]+===== Biological activity =====
  
-<blockquote>Affected people experience symptoms from exposure to RF transmissions, which include headaches, brain fog, inability to think clearly, speech disturbance, palpitations, sleep disturbance, epistaxis, fatigue, dizziness, vertigo, odd pains and tinglings in limbs - and interestingly ants exposed to wifi lose their ability to forage and die, amongst other creatures affected by non-thermal effects. Prevalence in the population is estimated at 3-5%, mainly undiagnosed.+[{{:home:waves:5G_burnt_his_body.gif?w=420h=960|** Effects of 5G in Costa del Sol illustrated by pensioner**}}]  
  
-Unfortunately, there is a common misperception that this is due to a nocebo effect - but the sham used in some trials was actually biologically active. CFS/ME and the Gulf War syndrome were both initially thought to be psychological disturbances by some investigators, since disproved. 
  
-The Austrian Medical Association has published guidelines on the topic [[http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/EMF-Guidelin...|EMF guidelines (Austria)]] + Abstract [[http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557|biological activity of low-intensity R F radiation]] 
-</blockquote>+ 
 +Analysis of the currently available peer-reviewed scientific literature reveals molecular effects induced by low-intensity RFR in living cells; this includes significant activation of key pathways generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of peroxidation, oxidative damage of DNA and changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes.  
 + 
 +It indicates that among 100 currently available peer-reviewed studies dealing with oxidative effects of low-intensity RFR, in general, 93 confirmed that RFR induces oxidative effects in biological systems.  
 + 
 +A wide pathogenic potential of the induced ROS and their involvement in cell signaling pathways explains a range of biological/health effects of low-intensity RFR, which include both cancer and non-cancer pathologies. 
 +(({{pubmed>long:26151230}}))  
 + 
 + 
 +On the basis of two decades of epidemiological studies, an increased risk for childhood leukemia associated with Extremely Low Frequency fields has been consistently assessed, inducing the International Agency for Research on Cancer to insert them in the 2B section of carcinogens in 2001.  
 + 
 +Care should be taken to avoid methodological limitations and to determine the patho-physiological relevance of any alteration found in EMFs-exposed biological system.  
 +(({{pubmed>long:3444040}}))                                          
  
  
-<blockquote> 
-Current UK safety limits for RF are based upon the flawed misapprehension that non-thermal = non-harmful, and at present there are no plans to review this. Basically, if it doesn’t start to cook you in six minutes, it’s safe….. 
  
-It has been known for well over 30 years that there are non-thermal (signal) effects of RF.  
  
-Non-thermal biological effects of exposure to RF (microwave) signal include increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, failure of repair of DNA breaks, heat shock protein synthesis, cellular calcium efflux, sympathetic upregulation and others. RF is currently classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Class 2b possible carcinogen. Other research shows adverse effects on semen quality amongst other biological effects. 
  
-History tells us that technological advance ALWAYS precedes safety considerations in all industries (see use of car safety belts, Xrays and asbestos for example), and the rollout of 24 hour transmitting wifi, cordless phones, and other technology has been on the presumption of no harm. 
-</blockquote> 
  
  
home/special/emf/body.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by 127.0.0.1
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.