This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
home:special:emf:body [05.26.2019] – [Effects of EMF on the human body] sallieq | home:special:emf:body [05.26.2019] – [Precautions] sallieq | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Precautions ===== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | //Dr Andrew PT Tresidder,// | ||
- | |||
- | < | ||
- | |||
- | Unfortunately, | ||
- | |||
- | The Austrian Medical Association has published guidelines on the topic [[http:// | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | < | ||
- | Current UK safety limits for RF are based upon the flawed misapprehension that non-thermal = non-harmful, | ||
- | |||
- | It has been known for well over 30 years that there are non-thermal (signal) effects of RF. | ||
- | |||
- | Non-thermal biological effects of exposure to RF (microwave) signal include increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, failure of repair of DNA breaks, heat shock protein synthesis, cellular calcium efflux, sympathetic upregulation and others. RF is currently classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Class 2b possible carcinogen. Other research shows adverse effects on semen quality amongst other biological effects. | ||
- | |||
- | History tells us that technological advance ALWAYS precedes safety considerations in all industries (see use of car safety belts, Xrays and asbestos for example), and the rollout of 24 hour transmitting wifi, cordless phones, and other technology has been on the presumption of no harm. | ||
- | </ | ||