Palliative vs. curative treatments

Related article: Immune Suppression


Many first-line treatments for chronic disease were developed before it was understood that the death of chronic bacteria necessarily results in an immunopathological response and temporary feelings of malaise. Such treatments are designed to slow the immune response under the mistaken premise that autoimmune disease results when the immune system attacks the body.

According to the Marshall PathogenesisA description for how chronic inflammatory diseases originate and develop., bacteria drive chronic disease, and treatments that slow the immune system only appear to “work” because they decrease bacterial death. While this causes a drop in inflammationThe complex biological response of vascular tissues to harmful stimuli such as pathogens or damaged cells. It is a protective attempt by the organism to remove the injurious stimuli as well as initiate the healing process for the tissue. that offers temporary symptomatic relief, bacteria which drive the disease state cease to be targeted and spread easily. The net result is that patients generally become increasingly ill over the long-term.

In essence, feeling better is not the same as getting better.

Anything which makes you feel better, almost always does so because it is stopping the immune system from killing the pathogens. The reason patients remain ill is that one just cannot apply the standard logic of “feeling well” to these chronic diseases. You have to understand the disease mechanism.

Trevor Marshall, PhD

In contrast, treatments that target the root cause of an illness rather than masking symptoms are curative in nature. While patients taking curative treatments may not always feel better during the course of therapy, such treatments have the potential to bring about lasting recovery.

Nevertheless, because palliative treatments that slow immune function are very effective at offering temporary relief, the number of medications, over-the-counter supplements, and fortified foods that work by slowing the immune response have escalated over the past decades. Since the goal of every Marshall ProtocolA curative medical treatment for chronic inflammatory disease. Based on the Marshall Pathogenesis. (MP) patient is to effectively target the bacteria making them ill, such immunosuppressants must be avoided. These immunosuppressants range from corticosteroids and TNF-alphaA cytokine critical for effective immune surveillance and is required for proper proliferation and function of immune cells. blocking medications to “vitamin” D.

Common sources of palliation

Those substances that aim to cover up disease symptoms but do not succeed at reversing the disease state are palliative in nature. A variety of commonly taken medications, foods, and supplements offer temporary palliation by depressing immune function.

We surgeons have been operating on the gut for literally thousands of years and the microbiota has just been this extraordinary elephant in the room. We seem to have completely ignored the fact that we've co-evolved with thousands of bacteria over millions of years and that they somehow may be important to our health. As doctors, we routinely do terrible things to the microbiota and I'm sure this has implications for our health.

James Kinross, Imperial College of London at 2008 International Conference on Metagenomics


Related article: Non-MP medications

The following is an incomplete list of medications that are immunosuppressive:

Relapse… rarely occurred in patients who had not been treated with corticosteroids in the past. The striking difference in relapse rate between treated and untreated patients suggests that patients with disease that would later be severe and protracted were almost unerringly identified early in their course…. Corticosteroids contribute to the prolongation of the disease by delaying resolution.

Jonathan E. Gottlieb et al.

Vitamin D may make a person feel better over the near-term, but longitudinal studies do not support its use. Source: Albert, PJ et al. (2009). Autoimmunity Reviews. Vitamin D: the alternative hypothesis.

Foods and supplements

The almost inevitable gravitation towards foods and supplements that slow immune activity (and diminish a bacterial die-off reaction) appears to be done subconsciously by people who play host to significant numbers of chronic bacteria. These foods and supplements include:

  • vitamin D – Emerging molecular evidence suggests that symptomatic improvements among those administered vitamin D is the result of its ability to temper bacterial-induced inflammation by slowing VDR activity.
  • soy – Soy contains phytoestrogens such as genistein, which act directly to inhibit innate immune function.
  • coffee – Coffee contains chlorogenic acidAn antioxidant and phenolic compound which in ways that are not yet fully clear can modulate and/or suppress the immune response, an antioxidant and phenolic compound, which, in ways that are not yet fully clear, can suppress the immune response. Frequent consumers of coffee often point to caffeine as giving coffee its addictive quality, but the role of chlorogenic acid offers another way that coffee can offer temporary symptom relief.
  • fish oil – In addition to containing high amounts of vitamin D, supplemental fish oil contains the omega 3 fatty acids, several of which have been shown to interfere with production of TNF-alpha, an important cytokine necessary for the response of the innate immune system.2)

Marshall Protocol patients are generally advised to avoid supplements and to consume any food in moderation. Additionally, MP patients should try to get any vitamin through whole foods.

The Marshall Protocol is a curative treatment

The Marshall Protocol (MP) is a curative therapy and represents an alternative to therapies which mask or delay symptoms of disease. The MP aims to target the Th1 PathogensThe community of bacterial pathogens which cause chronic inflammatory disease - one which almost certainly includes multiple species and bacterial forms., which we now believe are ultimately responsible for chronic inflammatory disease.

One cannot judge the success of any therapy in the treatment of chronic illness by symptomatic improvement over the short term.

Greg Blaney, MD

===== Notes and comments =====

Delted DaveW's patient quote. I don't think patient quotes add to this type of article. If the article doesn't make what DaveW said clear, then we should fix the article. — Paul Albert 06.07.2010

===== References =====

Gottlieb JE, Israel HL, Steiner RM, Triolo J, Patrick H. Outcome in sarcoidosis. The relationship of relapse to corticosteroid therapy. Chest. 1997 Mar;111(3):623-31. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.3.623.
[PMID: 9118698] [DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.3.623]
Maes M, Mihaylova I, Kubera M, Bosmans E. Why fish oils may not always be adequate treatments for depression or other inflammatory illnesses: docosahexaenoic acid, an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, induces a Th-1-like immune response. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007 Dec;28(6):875-80.
[PMID: 18063921]
home/patients/assessing_literature/palliative.txt · Last modified: 09.14.2022 by
© 2015, Autoimmunity Research Foundation. All Rights Reserved.